Journal of the European Optical Society - Rapid publications, Vol 5 (2010)

Origins of ambiguity in the inversion of remote sensing reflectance signals by spectral matching in optically complex shelf seas.

D. Creanor, A. Cunningham


The reported occurrence of multiple solutions in the inversion of remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) signals is of considerable significance for attempts to recover the concentrations of optically significant materials (OSMs) in shelf seas. The severity of this problem was assessed by quantifying the number of matches between individual multi wavelength remote sensing ‘observations’ and the entries in a pre-computed look-up table (LUT) spanning the range of possible observations. As a simplifying step, radiative transfer modeling was used to confirm the existence of a linear relationship between Rrs in the visible wavebands and the ratio of the backscattering to absorption coefficients (bb/a) over the full range of OSM concentrations likely to be found in shelf seas. This meant that an LUT of appropriate size and resolution could be constructed from bb/a vectors rather than Rrs spectra, with a considerable saving of computational effort. The number of matches in the LUT was then determined as a function of the degree of noise present in the observation and the strictness of the matching criterion (a simple least-squares fitting routine). Perfect matching for the six visible wavebands of the SeaWiFs satellite radiometer was achieved only when the ‘observed’ bb/a vector was represented exactly in the library. The introduction of noise representing observational errors rapidly led to multiple matches, as did relaxation of the matching criterion. As an example of the sensitivity of OSM recovery to errors of observation, it was found that an average error of 0.1%, statistically distributed across all wavebands, led to an average recovery error of 6.4% in CHL for 3000 randomly selected observations.

© The Authors. All rights reserved. [DOI: 10.2971/jeos.2010.10018s]

Full Text: PDF

Citation Details

Cite this article


T. Dickey, M. Lewis, and G. Chang, "Optical oceanography: Recent advances and future directions using global remote sensing and in situ observations" Rev. Geophys. 44, RG1001 (2006).

T. Platt, N. Hoepffner, V. Stuart, and C. Brown, Why Ocean Colour? The Societal Benefits of Ocean Colour Technology (Report Number 7, International Ocean Colour Coordinating Group, Dartmouth, Canada, 2008).

W. Petersen, H. Wehde, H. Krasemann, F. Colijn, and F. Schroeder, "FerryBox and MERIS Assessment of coastal and shelf sea ecosystems by combining in situ and remotely sensed data" Estuar. Coast Shelf S. 77, 296-307 (2008).

I. S. Robinson, Remote sensing of shelf sea ecosystems (Position Paper 12, European Science Foundation, Ostend, Belgium, 2008).

A. Morel, and L. Prieur, "Analysis of variations in ocean colour" Limnol. Oceanogr. 22, 709-722 (1977).

J. T. O. Kirk, "The relationship between the inherent and the apparent optical properties of surface waters and its dependence on the shape of the volume scattering function" in Ocean Optics, R. W. Spinrad, K. L. Carder, M. J. Perry, eds., (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994).

C. D. Mobley, Light and Water: Radiative Transfer in Natural Waters (Academic Press, San Diego, 1994).

C. D. Mobley, "Estimation of the remote-sensing reflectance from above-surface measurements" Appl. Opt. 38, 7442-7455 (1999).

J. A. Richards, and X. Jia, Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005).

H. Schiller, and R. Doerffer, "Neural network for emulation of an inverse model - operational derivation of case II water properties from MERIS data" Int. J. Remote Sens. 20, 17351746 (1999).

T. S. Kostadinov, D. A. Siegel, S. Maritorena, and N. Guillocheau, "Ocean color observations and modeling for an optically complex site: Santa Barbara Channel, California, USA" J. Geophys. Res. 112, C07011 (2007).

S. Maritorena, D. A. Siegel, and A. R. Peterson, "Optimization of a semianalytical ocean color model for global-scale applications" Appl. Opt. 41, 2705-2714 (2002).

D. A. Siegel, S. Maritorena, N. B. Nelson, and M. J. Behrenfeld, "Independence and interdependencies among global ocean color properties : Reassessing the bio-optical assumption" J. Geophys. Res. 110, C07011 (2005).

C. D. Mobley, L. K. Sundman, C. O. Davis, T. V. Downes, R. A. Leathers, M. J. Montes, J. H. Bowles, W. P. Bissett, D. D. R. Kohler, R. P. Reid, E. M. Louchard, and A. Gleason, "Interpretation of hyperspectral remote-sensing imagery via spectrum matching and look-up tables" Appl. Opt. 44, 3576-3592 (2005).

M. P. Lesser, and C. D. Mobley, "Bathymetry, optical properties, and benthic classification of coral reefs using hyperspectral remote sensing imagery" Coral Reefs 26, 819829 (2007).

M. Defoin-Platel, and M. Chami, "How ambiguous is the inverse problem of ocean color in coastal waters?" J. Geophys. Res. 112, C03004 (2007).

M. Babin, D. Stramski, G. M. Ferrari, H. Claustre, A. Bricaud, G. Obolensky, and N. Hoepffner, "Variations in the light absorption coefficients of phytoplankton, nonalgal particles, and dissolved organic matter in coastal waters around Europe" J. Geophys. Res. 108, 3211 (2003).

D. McKee, and A. Cunningham, "Identification and characterisation of two optical water types in the Irish Sea from in situ inherent optical properties and seawater constituents" Estuar. Coast Shelf S. 68, 305-316 (2006).

W. W. Gregg, N. W. Casey, J. E. O'Reilly, and W. E. Esias, "An empirical approach to ocean colour data: reducing bias and the need for post-launch radiometric re-calibration" Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 1598-1612 (2009).